KRISHNAN RAMNUJAM,MUMBAI vs. ITO 22(2)1, NAVI MUMBAI

Corrigendum We find that the Tribunal vide order dated 29/08/2017 disposed of the appeal of the assessee ( Assessment Year 2009-10, wherein, at page-4 of the order, the Ld. Assessing Officer was directed to examine Mr. Kanan on 15/12/2017. However, from the log book, we find that the date granted for examination of Mr. Kanan was on 05/12/2017 (as pronounced in the Court also) or within a week from 05/12/2017 and not 15/12/2017. Thus, an inadvertent typographical mistake occurred in the order. This date may be read as 05/12/2017 in place of 15/12/2017. The remaining part of the order will remain the same.