I.T.O., WARD-34(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. SRI BISWANATH PODDAR, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the AO's order was passed on a dead person, rendering it ab initio void. Therefore, the order was quashed.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) passed an order under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act on March 17, 2015. However, the assessee, Shri Biswanath Poddar, had passed away on December 30, 2014.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of an assessment order passed by the AO after the death of the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BENCH ‘D’ KOLKATA
Before: Hon’ble Shri J.Sudhakar Reddy, AM & Shri A.T.Varkey, JM ]
ORDER
PER J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, AM:
This is an appeal by the Revenue directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax-(A)-10, Kolkata relating to A.Y. 2012-13.
After hearing the rival submissions, we find that the AO has passed an order u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) on 17.03.2015 in the name of Shri Biswanath Poddar. Shri Biswanath Poddar passed away on 30.12.2014. Hence, the order was passed by the AO on a dead person. Hence the same is ab initio void and has to be quashed. In view of the above discussion we dismiss this revenue’s appeal.
In the result the appeal by the revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the Court on 14.03.2018.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026