FRANKDEAL MARKETING PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WD.-5(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal in limine for want of prosecution. This decision was based on the assessee's lack of interest in pursuing the case and non-compliance with notices.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was listed for hearing, but neither the assessee nor their representative appeared. The assessee had also previously failed to comply with notices from the CIT(A) and sought multiple adjournments.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's failure to prosecute their appeal and comply with procedural requirements.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.2,267 citing38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
- Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar v. CWT2,040 citing223 ITR 480 · 1997 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D ‘ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Shri Waseem Ahmed, & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi
This appeal filed by the Assessee is against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), 3, Kolkata dated 13- 02-2017 for the assessment year 2012-13.
It is noticed that the Registry fixed the appeal of the assessee for the hearing on 02-04-2018 by issuing notice dt. 21-02-2018. We find no representation on behalf of assessee nor filed any application seeking adjournment. On perusal of the record, we find that the assessee has not complied with the notice issued by the CIT-A in the first appellate proceedings in support of the grounds of appeal
therein and kept on seeking adjournments from the months of May, 2016 to October 2016 i.e. for five months. It appears that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting its case. In view of the above, following the decisions of the ITAT, Delhi Bench in the case of Multiplan India (P) Limited reported in 38 ITD 320(Del) and Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar Vs. CWT reported in (223 ITR 480(MP), we dismiss the appeal of the assessee in limine for want of prosecution.
3. In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is dismissed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 02-04-2018 Sd/- Sd/- Waseem Ahmed S.S.Viswanethra Ravi Accountant Member Judicial Member
Dated: 02-04-2018
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026