Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH : CHENNAI
Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE]
आदेश / O R D E R
PER ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER During the course of hearing, we find that a notice dated 14.02.2018 was sent / served on the assessee on 15.02.2018, informing the date of hearing. Postal acknowledgement is available on record. Despite notice, at the time of hearing, none has appeared on behalf of the assessee. Hence, it is inferred that the assessee is not
ITA No. 1706/Mds/2017. :- 2 -: interested in prosecuting the appeal. Following the decision of the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case of CIT v. Multiplan (India) Ltd. (38 ITD 320) (Del), We dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee, for non-prosecution.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands dismissed. 2.
Order pronounced in the open court on Monday, the 19th day of March, 2018, at Chennai.