Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
ITA-149 and 150
IN THE
ITA-149
Shri Hari and co
Principal Comm 2. ITA-150
Shri Hari and co
Principal Comm
CORAM: HO
Present: Mr
for
for
** SUDEEPTI SH 1.
Th appellant (s) ha Tax Act, 1961 Appellate Tribu Nos. 402/Chd/2 AY 2012-2013 2.
Le pendency of the for recalling th of 2024 HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A
CHAND 9-2024 o owners
Vs.
missioner of Income Tax, Rohtak 0-2024 o owners
Vs.
missioner of Income Tax, Rohtak
Da ON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN ON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUD r. Nikhil Goyal, Advocate r the apellant (s) s. Gauri Neo Rampal, Sr. Standin th Mr. V. Vedika Rao, Advocate r the respondent (s). ** HARMA, J. his order shall dispose of the ave preferred the appeals filed u (for short “Act 1961”) again unal, Bench “B” at Chandigarh 2022 dated 31.07.2022 and 403 and 2013-2014 respectively. earned counsel for the appellant e appeal(s), the appellant(s) ha he impugned order(s) in both AND HARYANA AT DIGARH
. . . . Appellant k
. . . . Respondent
. . . . Appellant k
. . . . Respondent ate of decision:-11.02.2025 N PALLI DEEPTI SHARMA ng counsel (Through VC) e above two appeals wherein th under Section 260 of the Incom nst the order of the Income Ta (for short ‘the Tribunal’) in IT 3/Chd/2022 dated 31.07.2022 fo (s) contend that since during th ave already moved application( the appeals before the learne
t t he me ax TA for he (s) ed Gaurav Arora 2025.02.18 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
ITA-149 and 150
Tribunal, theref remedy before t 3.
In present appeals 4.
[ARUN PALL JUDGE
February 11, 2 Gaurav Arora
of 2024 fore, he wishes to withdraw the the Tribunal. view of the statement of learned are dismissed as withdrawn. nding application (s), if any also I]
[SU
2025 Whether speaking/reason Whether reportable e present appeal(s) to pursue the d counsel for the appellant(s), th o stands disposed of. UDEEPTI SHARMA] JUDGE ned : Yes/No : Yes/No
eir he Gaurav Arora 2025.02.18 15:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document