M. RAGHURAM P NAMBYAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION),
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive it if necessary.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the High Court of Karnataka against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's decision to withdraw the appeal filed against the ITAT's order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2021 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR ITA NO.432 OF 2018 BETWEEN: M. RAGHURAM P NAMBYAR, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, HAVING PAN AAUPN1489L, RESIDING AT E-901, MANTRI ESPANA, DEVARABISANAHALLI, BELLANDUR POST, BANGALORE - 560103. ... APPELLANT (BY MISS MAHIM GOUD, ADVOCATE FOR SRI T.SURYANARAYANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME-TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION),
CIRCLE -1(2), BANGALORE,
BMTC BUILDING,
80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK,
KORAMANGALA,
BENGALURU - 560095. 2. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME-TAX, BANGALORE
BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD,
6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA,
BENGALURU - 560095. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
2 THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 02.03.2018, PASSED IN ITA NO. 2007/BANG/2016, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009- 2010, PRAYING TO:
(A) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE; (B) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH 'C', PRONOUNCED ON 02.03.2018 IN ITA NO. 2007/BANG/2016 (ANNEXURE-'C'); AND
(C) PASS SUCH OTHER OR FURTHER ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Miss. Mahim Goud, learned counsel for Mr. T. Suryanarayana, learned counsel for the assessee.
Mr. K.V. Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue.
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal.
The said memo is placed on record.
For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to revive the same, if occasion so arises. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE HR
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026