J.P MORGAN SERVICES INDIA P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT RG 10(2)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal decided to issue a corrigendum to rectify the clerical mistake. The name of the assessee was corrected from 'J.P. Morgan Services Pvt. Ltd.' to 'J.P. Morgan Services India Private Limited'.
What were the facts?
The assessee, J.P. Morgan Services India Private Limited, brought to the Tribunal's notice that the word 'India' was missing from its name in a previous order. The Tribunal reviewed the order and found this to be a clerical mistake.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was a clerical error in the assessee's name as recorded in the Tribunal's order.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
In the said appeals, the Tribunal has passed a common and consolidated order on 11.08.2017. The assessee vide letter dated 15.11.2017 has brought to our notice that the word ‘India’ is missing
Co rri g en d um -IT A No .998 & 1184/Mum/2015 in the address of the assessee company and has submitted that a corrigendum may be issued to mention correct address of the assessee company in the said order.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026