MAHESHWARI WIRES PVT LTD,MEERUT vs. ACIT,CIRCLE 1(1)(1) , MEERUT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the possibility of communication gaps leading to the ex-parte proceedings. In the interest of justice, the appeals were restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeals arose from ex-parte orders passed by the CIT(A)/NFAC, affirming the Assessing Officer's additions. The Revenue argued that the assessee failed to provide any explanation or evidence.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in proceeding ex-parte against the assessee without proper opportunity, and if the matter should be remanded for fresh adjudication.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘G’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
ORDER PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM These assessee’s twin appeals & 4062/Del/2025 for assessment year 2018-19, arise against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s orders, both dated 25.04.2025 having DINs and orders no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025- 26/1075821791(1) and ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025- 26/1075821440(1), involving proceedings under section 270 and 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), respectively. Cases called twice. None appears at the assessee’s behest. He is accordingly proceeded ex-parte.
It emerges at the outset during the course of hearing that the learned CIT(A)/NFAC in its order has proceeded ex-parte against the assessee thereby affirming the Assessing Officer’s action making the corresponding disallowance/addition herein.
The Revenue argues during the course of hearing in support of CIT(A)/NFAC’s findings that the assessee had not filed any explanation or evidence supporting his case.
We have given our thoughtful consideration to the foregoing rival stands and are of the considered view that since the CIT(A)/NFAC has proceeded ex-parte against the assessee, possibility of some communication gaps between the taxpayer, auditor and the arguing counsel could not be altogether ruled out.
Faced with this situation, in the larger interest of justice, we deem it appropriate to restore the assessee’s
2 | P a g e instant appeals back to the CIT(A) for his afresh appropriate adjudication, within three effective opportunities subject to a rider that the taxpayer shall plead and prove the case at his own risk and responsibility, in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly. The assessee’s “quantum” appeal is accepted for statistical purposes. Same order to follow in the assessee’s “penalty” appeal being consequential in nature.
More judgments on Section 270
- Sachin Bajaj, New Delhi vs ITO Ward 2, RohtakITA 4220/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed1 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Koncept Marktrade Private Limited, Delhi vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 960/DEL/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed7 Jul 2026AY 2022-23
- Sri Balagopalan Jewellerymart, South Avani… vs DCIT, Central Cir 3(3) Chennai…ITA 3945/CHNY/2025[2020-2021]Status: Disposed26 May 2026AY 2020-2021
- Sri Balagopalan Jewellerymart, South Avani… vs DCIT, Central Cir 3(3) Chennai…ITA 3941/CHNY/2025[2019-2020]Status: Disposed26 May 2026AY 2019-2020
- Sri Balagopalan Jewellerymart, South Avani… vs DCIT, Central Cir 3(3) Chennai…ITA 3903/CHNY/2025[2019-2020]Status: Disposed26 May 2026AY 2019-2020
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026