M/S. MUKTAMANI COMMERCIAL PVT LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 4(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT found that the CIT(A) should have decided the appeal on merits even without the assessee's presence. Therefore, the ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the case for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed ex parte due to non-appearance. The assessee then appealed this dismissal to the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be dismissed ex parte solely on the ground of non-appearance, or if it should be decided on merits. The procedural fairness of the appellate process.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH : KOLKATA
Before: Hon’ble Shri S.S.Godara, JM & Hon’ble Shri M.Balaganesh, AM]
ORDER Per M.Balaganesh, AM
This appeal by the Assessee arises out of the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-2, Kolkata [in short the ld CIT(A)] in Appeal No.621/CIT(A)- 2/15-16 dated 02.03.2017 against the order passed by ITO, Ward-4(2), Kolkata [ in short the ld AO] under section 147 / 143(3) / 263 / 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) dated 16.03.2015 for the Assessment Year 2009-10.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee.
We have heard the ld. DR. We find that the Ld. CIT(A) had passed an ex parte order dismissing the appeal of the assessee on the ground of non-appearance by the assessee.
M/s Muktamani Commercial Pvt. Ltd A.Yr. 2009-10 We find that the Ld. CIT(A) ought to have disposed off the appeal on merits even in the absence of compliance by the assessee. Hence in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and fair play, we deem it fit and appropriate to set aside this appeal to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for de novo adjudication in accordance with law. We direct the assessee to appear before us on 24.04.2019 and not to take any adjournment except due to exceptional or bonafide circumstances. Hence the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes . Order pronounced in the Court on 28.12.2018 Sd/- Sd/- [S.S. Godara] [ M.Balaganesh ] Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated : 28.12.2018 SB, Sr. PS Copy of the order forwarded to:
1. 1. M/s Muktamani Commercial Pvt. Ltd., 3A, Mangoe Lane, 1st Floor, Kolkata-1.
2. ITO, Ward-4(2), Kolkata, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata-700069. 3..C.I.T.(A)- 4. C.I.T.- Kolkata.
5. CIT(DR), Kolkata Benches, Kolkata.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Marico Limited vs. Shree Uday Oil And Food Industries LLPDelhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Laborate Pharmaceuticals INDIA Limited vs. M/S Jmbs Healthcare Through Its PartnersDelhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Pharmed Limited vs. Best Biotech & Ors.Delhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Kbb Nuts PVT. Limited vs. Mr. Suresh Chand & Ors.Delhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Amritsar Haveli Cuisines Private Limited & Anr. vs. Amarbir Singh & Ors.Delhi · 3 Nov 2026