INTEGRATED COAL MINING LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 6(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 18/KOL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 January 2019AY 2010-113 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the issue of disallowance under Section 43B to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. This was to be done in accordance with law, considering the outcome of Supreme Court proceedings in a related case.

What were the facts?

The assessee appealed the CIT(A)'s order which set aside the disallowance of provision for leave encashment to the Assessing Officer. The disallowance was made under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) exceeded his powers by setting aside the disallowance of provision for leave encashment to the Assessing Officer. The legality of the disallowance itself was also to be re-examined.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 43B,Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘D’ BENCH, KOLKATA

Before: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi]

Date of concluding the hearing : November 27th, 2018 Date of pronouncing the order : January 9th, 2019 O R D E R Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, AM :-

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 8, Kolkata, (hereinafter the ‘ld. CIT (A)’), passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’), dt. 21/11/2017, for the Assessment Year 2010-11, on the following grounds:- “

1. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned CIT (Appeals) erred in setting aside the issue of disallowance of provision for leave encashment under section 43B of the Act amounting to Rs.6,12,100/- to the file of the Assessing Officer in excess of the powers granted to him.

2. That the appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify, rescind, supplement or alter any of the grounds stated hereinabove either before or at the time of hearing of this appeal.”

2. We have heard rival contentions. On careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, perusal of the papers on record, orders of the authorities below as well as case law cited, we hold as follows:-

3. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, we follow the decision of the Kolkata ‘C’ Bench of the ITAT, in & 1138/Kol/2012; Assessment Year 2008-09; dt. 30/11/2015, and restore this issue of disallowance u/s 43B of the Act,

Assessment Year: 2010-11 Integrated Coal Mining Limited to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication in accordance with law based on the outcome of the appeal on merits by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of UOI vs. Exide Industries Ltd. in SLP proceedings in CC 12060/2008, dt. 08/09/2008 and in CC 22889/2008, order dt. 08/05/2009.

4.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Kolkata, the 9th day of January, 2019. Sd/- Sd/- [S.S. Viswanethra Ravi] [J. Sudhakar Reddy] Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated : 09.01.2019 {SC SPS} Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Integrated Coal Mining Limited 6, Church Lane Kolkata – 700 001 2. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-6(1), Kolkata 3. CIT(A)- 4. CIT- , 5. CIT(DR), Kolkata Benches, Kolkata.

More judgments on Section 43B

All 7,161 judgments and leading authorities on Section 43B →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →