THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S FIS SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT LTD.,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court, in view of the Revenue's submission, dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. This means the ITAT's decision remains undisturbed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court of Karnataka against an ITAT order. The Revenue's counsel sought permission to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the Revenue's decision to withdraw its appeal against the ITAT's order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
I.T.A. NO.333 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
INCOME TAX OFFICER
P.M.T. BUILDING, A-WING
THIRD FLOOR, SWARGATE
SHANKAR SHET ROAD
PUNE-411037.
THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
CIRCLE-12(3), PRESENT ADDRESS
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CIRCLE-1(2), P.M.T. BUILDING
2ND FLOOR, SWARGATE, PUNE-411037.
... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND:
M/S. FIS SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT. LTD., (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SUNGARD SOLUTIONS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,) 6TH FLOOR, EMBASSY ICON INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU-560001 PRESENT ADDRESS UPPER GROUND FLOOR TO 7TH FLOOR
WESTEND CENTRE ONE SURVEY NO.169/1, SECTOR II AUNDH, PUNE-411007 PAN: AAACE 7476K.
... RESPONDENT - - -
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T. ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 30/7/2015 PASSED IN IT (TP)A NO.148/BANG/2012 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09 PRAYING TO: I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. II. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN
IT(TP)A NO.1487/BANG/2012 DATED 30/7/2015 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09 ANNEXURE-E AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE DRP CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-12(3), BENGALURU & ETC.
THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the appellants has appeared through video conference.
Learned counsel for the revenue submits that the appellants be permitted to withdraw the appeal without prejudice to the similar questions being raised in other appeals.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of liberty as prayed for.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026