M/S. AMBLEE RESORTS INTERNATIONAL PVT LIMITED vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive it if necessary.
What were the facts?
The assessee, M/s. Amblee Resorts International Pvt. Limited, represented by its erstwhile director, filed an appeal before the High Court. The appeal was against an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for assessment years 1995-96 and 1996-97.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal filed under Section 260-A of the IT Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
I.T.A. NO.544 OF 2014
BETWEEN:
M/S. AMBLEE RESORTS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS ERSTWHILE DIRECTOR AND AGGRIEVED PERSON SRI. SATISH CHANDRA AMBLEE NO.1430, 13TH CROSS WEST OF CHORD ROAD 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-560086. ... APPELLANT
(BY SRI. A. SHANKAR, SR. COUNSEL A/W SRI. M. LAVA, ADV.,)
AND:
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-11(1), R.P. BHAVAN OPP. RBI, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BANGALORE-560001. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,)
- - -
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 25-07-2014 PASSED IN ITA NO.63 & 64/BANG/2012 AND CO Nos.84 & 85/BANG/2012 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 1995-96 AND 1996-97, PRAYING TO: I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT. II. TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE ORDER DATED 25-07-2014 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH IN ITA NOs.63 & 64/BANG/2012 AND CO Nos.84 & 85/BANG/2012 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 1995-96 AND 1996-97.
THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Mr.A.Shankar, learned Senior counsel for Mr.M.Lava, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the revenue has entered appearance through video conferencing.
Learned Senior counsel for the assessee has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal with liberty to revive the same, if so required. The aforesaid memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of liberty as prayed for.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026