SYNOPSYS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED vs. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court took the memo on record and, for the reasons stated therein, dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Synopsys International Limited, filed an appeal before the High Court of Karnataka. The assessee's counsel later filed a memo seeking to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I. ARUN
I.T.A. NO.414 OF 2015
BETWEEN:
SYNOPSYS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED BLOCK 1, BLANCHARDSTOWN CORPORATE PARK BLANCHARDSTOWN, DUBLIN 15 IRELAND REP. HEREIN BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. DARRAGH POWER.
C/O: SYNOPSYS (INDIA) PVT. LTD., RMZ INFINITY, TOWER ‘A’ 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR OLD MADRAS ROAD BENNIGANAHALLI BANGALORE-560016. ... APPELLANT (BY SMT. TANMAYI RAJKUMAR, ADV., FOR SRI. T. SURYANARAYANA, ADV.,)
AND:
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX
(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)
CIRCLE-2(1), NO.14/3-A 6TH FLOOR, R.P. BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BANGALORE-560001.
THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX
(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)
NO.14/3-A, 6TH FLOOR, R.P. BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE-560001. ... RESPONDENTS - - -
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 07-04-2015 PASSED IN ITA NO.1296/BANG/2014, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12, PRAYING TO: I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. II. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE COMMON ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 7- 4-2015, TO THE EXTENT THE APPELLANT’S APPEAL IN ITA NO.1296/BANG/2014 WAS DISMISSED.
THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Smt.Tanmayee Rajkumar, learned counsel for Mr.T.Suryanarayana, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.
Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. The aforesaid memo is taken on record.
For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026