INTEL SERVICES INC vs. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the Court.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Intel Services Inc., filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal filed by the assessee should be allowed to be withdrawn.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I. ARUN
I.T.A. NO.413 OF 2015
BETWEEN:
INTEL SERVICES INC (NOW INTEL SERVICES LLC) A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA C/O INTEL TECHNOLOGY INDIA P. LTD SRR2, NO.23-56P DEVARABEESANAHALLI OUTER RING ROAD BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE-560037 REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE MRS. SUMITA THOMAS. ... APPELLANT (BY SMT. TANMAYI RAJKUMAR, ADV., FOR SRI. T. SURYANARAYANA, ADV.,)
AND:
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX
(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) – I
NO.14/3, 6TH FLOOR, R.P. BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE-560001.
DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX
(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)
NO.14/3-A, 6TH FLOOR
R.P. BHAVAN, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BANGALORE-560001. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) - - -
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 20-03-2015 PASSED IN ITA NO.1528/BANG/2010, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07, PRAYING TO: I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. II. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 20-03-2015 IN ITA NO.1528/BANG/2010.
THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Smt.Tanmayee Rajkumar, learned counsel for Mr.T.Suryanarayana, learned counsel for the assessee. Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the assessee.
Learned counsel for the assessee has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal. The aforesaid memo is taken on record.
For the reasons assigned in the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026