THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MR IQBAL ISMAIL VIRANI
What did the High Court hold?
The appellants (Revenue) sought permission to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file it before the appropriate court. The Court granted the permission and disposed of the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Revenue sought to set aside the Tribunal's order and confirm the lower authorities' orders.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal filed by the Revenue should be allowed. However, the appeal was withdrawn by the Revenue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
I.T.A.No.174/2022
BETWEEN :
1 . THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, 4TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095
2 . THE INCOME TAX OFFICER INTERNATIONAL TAXATION WARD-1
PRESENT ADDRESS: DCIT CIRCLE-2(1), 4TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 095.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND :
Mr. IQBAL ISMAIL VIRANI VIRANI NIWAS Dr. B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, ALTINHO, MAPUSA GOA-403507, PAN: ATWPV4826E
…RESPONDENT
- 2 -
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 12.03.2021 PASSED IN ITA NO.187/PAN/2019, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015 PRAYING TO I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN. II. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI, IN ITA NO.187/PAN/2019 DATED 12.03.2021 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015 ANNEXURE-C CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-2(1), BENGALURU.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, S. SUJATHA, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the above appeal with liberty to file the same before the appropriate Court.
Memo is placed on record. Permission is granted.
Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as sought for.
- 3 -
Registry shall return the original documents, if any, to the appellants, keeping photocopies of the same for record purpose.
SD/- JUDGE
SD/- JUDGE
KTY
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026