THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S TIMBLO PVT LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court granted the Revenue's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file it before the appropriate court.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court against an ITAT order. The Revenue's counsel later filed a memo seeking to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the Revenue's request to withdraw their appeal before the High Court.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF APRIL, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
I.T.A.No.234/2022
BETWEEN :
1 . THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, C.R.BUILDING, QUEEN’S ROAD, BENGALURU-560001
2 . THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, PLOT NO.5, EDC COMPLEX, PATTO, PANAJI-403001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI M.DILIP, ADV. FOR SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND :
M/s TIMBLO PVT. LTD., KADAR MANZIL, NEAR HARI MANDIR, MARGAO, GOA-403601 PAN: AABCT1944N
…RESPONDENT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 07.10.2021 PASSED IN C.O.23/PAN/2017 IN IT(SS)A NO.14/PAN/2017, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF
- 2 -
LAW STATED THEREIN AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN C.O.No.23/PAN/2017 IN IT(SS)A NO.14/PAN/2017 DATED 07.10.2021 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009 ANNEXURE-D CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PANAJI, GOA.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, S. SUJATHA, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the above appeal with liberty to file the same before the appropriate Court.
Memo is placed on record. Permission is granted.
Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as sought for.
- 3 -
Registry shall return the original documents, if any, to the appellants, keeping photocopies of the same for record purpose.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
PMR
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026