PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S MCAFEE SOFTWARE
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted the memo filed by the Revenue and permitted the withdrawal of the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Revenue later filed a memo stating that the matter was settled under the VSVS 2020 Scheme.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the Revenue's request to withdraw the appeal due to a settlement under the VSVS 2020 Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25052-DB ITA No. 236 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.236 OF 2017 BETWEEN:
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 BMTC COMPLEX KORAMANGALA BANGALORE
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-12(1) BANGALORE …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. E I SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S MCAFEE SOFTWARE (INDIA) PVT. LTD. EMBASSY GOLF LINKS BUSINESS PARK PINE VALLEY, 2ND FLOOR OFF. INDIRANAGAR KORAMANGALA INTERMEDIDATE RING ROAD BANGALORE - 560 071
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K R VASUDEVAN, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by MADHUSHREE H Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25052-DB ITA No. 236 of 2017
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO (a) DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND / OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HON'BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT; (b) SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 11/08/2016 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, 'B' BENCH, BENGALURU, IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS NO.IT(TP)A.NO.11/BANG/2012 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007- 08, AS SOUGHT FOR IN THIS APPEAL; AND TO GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS DEEMED FIT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT)
Memo dated 05.07.2025 is filed by the learned counsel for the appellants – revenue stating that the matter is settled in VSVS 2020 Scheme and seeks permission to withdraw the appeal.
Memo is placed on record.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25052-DB ITA No. 236 of 2017
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
MH/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026