THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIT(A) vs. M/S. GMR ENERGY LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The Revenue filed a memo seeking to withdraw the appeal. The Court granted leave to withdraw the appeal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the Revenue's decision to withdraw its appeal before the High Court.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M. ADIGA
I. T. A. NO.175 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
CIT(A), CENTRAL CIRCLE
C.R.BUILDING
QUEEN'S ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), PRESENT ADDRESS
JCIT (OSD), CENTRAL RANGE -2 (2)
C.R. BUILDING
QUEEN'S ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001. … APPELLANTS (BY SRI. M. DILIP, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S. GMR ENERGY LTD 25/1, SKIP HOUSE MUSEUM ROAD BENGALURU - 560 025. PAN - AAACT 8420A
… RESPONDENT (BY SRI. BALARAM R. RAO, ADVOCATE)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 23.10.2019 PASSED IN C.O.No.5/BANG/2017 (IN ITA No.1735/BANG/2017), FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-2012 PRAYING TO: I) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE AND II) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET-ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN C.O.NO.5/BANG/2017 (IN ITA No.1735/BANG/2017) DATED:23.10.2019 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-2012 ANNEXURE-C AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD), CENTRAL RANGE-2(2), BENGALURU AND III) PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, P.S. DINESH KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Shri. M. Dilip, learned Advocate for the Revenue has filed a memo of even date seeking leave to withdraw this appeal. 2. Memo be kept in record. Leave granted. 3. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026