THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S VENKATESHA EDUCATION SOCIETY

PDF · subscribers
ITA/257/2013HC KarnatakaKAHC01020841201310 January 2023Bench: P.S.DINESH KUMAR,G BASAVARAJA2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court noted that the settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme meant nothing survived in the appeal. The Revenue did not dispute this fact.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court against an order of the ITAT. The respondent, Venkatesha Education Society, filed a memo stating that the matter has been settled under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable after the settlement of the dispute under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260-A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

- 1 -

ITA No. 257 of 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 257 OF 2013 BETWEEN: 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, C.R.BUILDING QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2) C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE …APPELLANTS

(BY SHRI. K.V. ARAVIND, SENIOR STANDING COUSNEL) AND: M/S VENKATESHA EDUCATION SOCIETY NO.125, ARMSTRONG ROAD SHIVAJI NAGR BANGALORE-560 001 …RESPONDENT (BY SHRI. S. PARTHASARATHI, ADVOCATE)

THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF I.T. ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND ALLOW THE APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.105/BANG/2012 DATED 21.12.2012 CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE

Digitally signed by YASHODHA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

- 2 -

ITA No. 257 of 2013

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(2), BANGALORE AND ETC.

THIS ITA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Ms.Tanmayee Rajkumar, learned advocate for the respondent has filed memo dated 02.01.2023 stating that matter has been settled under Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and nothing survives in this appeal. 2. Shri K.V.Aravind, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Revenue does not dispute the facts stated in the memo and prays that this appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Leave granted. This appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

No costs.

Sd/- JUDGE

Sd/- JUDGE

YN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0

More judgments on Section 260-A

All 2,570 judgments and leading authorities on Section 260-A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →