THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI. B. RAVI KUMAR REDDY
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court granted the Revenue's request to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court of Karnataka against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the High Court should allow the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the Revenue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
- 1 -
ITA No. 412 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.412 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, C.R.BUILDING QUEEN’S ROAD BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYDERABAD PRESENT ADDRESS DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2) C.R.BUILDING QUEEN’S ROAD BENGALURU-560 001 …APPELLANTS
(BY SHRI. K.V. ARAVIND, SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL) AND: SHRI. B. RAVI KUMAR REDDY NO.48/1, C.M.MOHAN BUILDING TUMKUR ROADmk YESHWANTHPUR BENGALURU-560 022 PAN-ADLPR6631A …RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI. S. ANNAMALAI, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by YASHODHA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
ITA No. 412 of 2022
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN AND ALLOW THE APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN C.O.NO.26/HYD/2014 IN ITA NO.1147/HYD/2013 DATED 04.04.2022 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009 ANNEXURE-C AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BENGALURU AND ETC.
THIS ITA, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Shri M.Dilip, learned Standing Counsel for the appellants has filed a memo of even date seeking leave to withdraw this appeal. 2. Memo be kept in record. Leave granted. This appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
YN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026