Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ITA Nos. 964, 967, 984, 985, 986, 987, 988, 989, 991, 992 1001, 1002, 1003, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1013, 1014 1015 and 1028 of 2009
Dictated on: 15th October 2009
Commissioner of Income Tax
. . . Appellant
through:
Ms. Prem Lata Bansal with Ms. Anshul Sharma, Advocates
VERSUS
'M/s. Mohan Meakin Ltd.
... Respondent
through:
Mr. C.S. Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate
CORAM :-
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
- 1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment? - 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? - 3. Whether the Judgment should be reported in the Digest?
A.K. SIKRI, J. (ORAL)
Common issue which is raised in all these appeals preferred by the Revenue concerns allowing the assessee the expenses incurred in puja, hawan, kirtan etc. under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee is the same in all these appeals and issue relates to different assessment orders. Therefore, these appeals were taken up together for hearing.
The build facts are that the accesses company, as a welfare measure
% 15.10.2009
Present: Ms. Prem Lata Bansal with Ms. Anshul Sharma,
Adv. for the appellant.
Mr. C.S.Aggarwal, Sr.Adv. with Mr. Prakash Kumar
for the respondent.
+ ITA Nos. 964/2009, 967/2009, 984/2009, 985/2009, 988/2009, 989/2009, 991/2009, 1003/2009, 1014/2009, 1009/2009, 1013/2009 & 1015/2009
Due to typographical error, these cases have been included in the batch of cases which are dismissed today being ITA No. 964/2009. In fact, they are listed for 21st October, 2009.
It is clarified that the aforesaid cases are not covered by the orders passed in ITA No. 964/2009.
A.K. SIKRI, J.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.
October 15, 2009