P.VIJAY KUMAR,CHENNAI vs ITO BUSINESS WARD XV(3), CHENNAI

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH : CHENNAI

Before: SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE & SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY]

For Respondent: Shri. AR.V. Sreenivasan, IRS, JCIT

आदेश / O R D E R PER ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER When this appeal was called up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. We find that notice for hearing pointing out defects which were to be rectified was sent to the assessee by Registered Post and acknowledgment card is available on record. The defects pointed out in the said notice were as under:-

ITA No.1860 /2018 :- 2 -:

(i) Fees not paid under the sub head ‘’Others’’. (ii) Form 26AS, to be filed’’.

Since assessee has not cared to rectify the defects despite notice, the appeal cannot survive.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands dismissed.

P.VIJAY KUMAR,CHENNAI vs. ITO BUSINESS WARD XV(3), CHENNAI