VC CORPORATE ADVISORS PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that there was a reasonable cause for the assessee's absence. Therefore, the ex parte order of the CIT(A) was set aside.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was decided ex parte as the assessee's AR could not attend the hearing due to sickness. The assessee had filed an adjournment application which was acknowledged.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in passing an ex parte order without considering the reasonable cause for the assessee's absence.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri A. T. Varkey, JM & Dr. A. L. Saini, AM]
This appeal filed by assessee is against the order of Ld. CIT(A) - 1, Kolkata dated 25.06.2018 for AY 2014-15.
At the outset itself, it has been brought to our notice that this is an ex parte order passed by the Ld. CIT(A). Before us, the Ld. AR contended that on the date when the matter was fixed, the Ld. AR of the assessee was sick and could not attend on that date. Therefore, the Ld. CIT(A) passed the ex parte order. We note that the case was fixed thrice on 07.06.2018, 15.06.2018 and thereafter on 22.06.2018 and taking note that none appeared on 22.06.2018, the Ld. CIT(A) passed the ex parte order. We note that on 16.06.2018 the assessee has filed adjournment application which has been acknowledged by the Ld. CIT(A). It was brought to our notice that the Ld. AR of the assessee fell sick and was, therefore, could not attend the hearing. Since there is a reasonable cause for the Ld. AR of the assessee not to appear before the Ld. CIT(A), for the interest of justice and fair play, we set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and remand the matter back to his file to adjudicate the M/s. V. C. Corporate Advisors Pvt. Ltd., AY 2014-15 appeal on merits after affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee and in accordance to law. The appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 10th April, 2019 Sd/- Sd/- (Dr. A. L. Saini) (A. T. Varkey) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated: 10th April, 2019 Jd.(Sr.P.S.) Copy of the order forwarded to: 1 Appellant –M/s. V. C. Corporate Advisors Pvt. Ltd., Suit No. 2C, 2nd floor, Elegange Building, 31, Ganesh Chandra Avenue, Kolkata-700 013. 2 Respondent – DCIT, Circle-2(2), Kolkata. 3 CIT(A)-1 , Kolkata. (sent through e-mail) CIT , Kolkata 4 DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata (sent through e-mail) 5
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026