M/S. UZIND CORPORATION,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer correctly identified expenditure related to exempt income and made the disallowance as per the Tribunal's directions. Although Rule 8D was not directly applicable for the assessment year, its method was used to calculate indirect expenses, which was deemed justified.
What were the facts?
The assessee incurred expenditure related to securities and claimed other expenses indirectly related to exempt income. The Assessing Officer disallowed Rs. 2,47,023 under Section 14A, adopting the method prescribed in Rule 8D(2)(iii). This disallowance was confirmed by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance under Section 14A was correctly made by the Assessing Officer, considering the applicability of Rule 8D for the assessment year 2007-08.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Hero Cycles Ltd.470 citing323 ITR 518 · 2010 · HC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “C”, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI P. M. JAGTAP & MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE
confirming the same. In that view of the matter, we uphold the impugned order of the ld. CIT(A) on this issue and dismiss this appeal filed by the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open Court on this 13th day of July, 2018.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026