Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “G”, NEW DELHI
Before: SH. N.K.SAINI & SH. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA
PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER :
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 28.06.2016 passed by learned CIT(A)-22, New Delhi for assessment year 2010-11.
The notice for hearing on 25.07.2018 had been sent by the speed post on the given address by the assessee at serial no. 10 of Form No. 36. At the time of hearing, no one was present on behalf of the assessee and no request for adjournment has also come on record. Therefore, it can be safely inferred that the assessee is not serious in pursuing its appeal. In the circumstances, the only alternative left with us is to dismiss the appeal of the assessee in limine. Support is drawn from the order of Tribunal in CIT vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del.) and of M.P. High Court in Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP).
Before parting, we think it appropriate to add that in case the assessee is able to show reasonable cause for non-representation on the date of hearing, then it may, if so advised, pray for recall of this order and decision on merits.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 25.07.2018.