MR ARIHANT PATNI,PUNE vs. ADCIT CIRCLE-7, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, noting no objection from the Ld. DR, allowed the assessee's application for withdrawal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as having been withdrawn, as the underlying grievance had already been resolved by the Assessing Officer.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order for Assessment Year 2022-23. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee sought to withdraw the appeal, stating that the Assessing Officer had already rectified the TDS/TCS claim by passing an order under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, thereby addressing the assessee's grievance.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal seeking relief for TDS/TCS claims can be withdrawn and dismissed as such, if the Assessing Officer has already rectified the grievance under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
Mr. Arihant Patni Asst./Dy.CIT, Circle 7, S.No.1A, F-1, Pune Vs. Irani Market Compound, Yerwada, Pune – 411006 PAN: AGUPP5917H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Kiran B Sanmane Department by : Shri Deepak Kumar Kedia, JCIT (through virtual) Date of hearing : 11-02-2026 Date of pronouncement : 11-02-2026 O R D E R PER R.K. PANDA, VP:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 28.02.2025 of the Ld. Addl / JCIT(A)-3, Kolkata relating to assessment year 2022- 23.
The Ld. Counsel for the assessee at the outset filed an application seeking withdrawal of the appeal on the ground that the Assessing Officer has already allowed the TDS / TCS claim made by the assessee in the order passed u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus, the grievance of the assessee has been addressed. In absence of any objection from the side of the Ld. DR, the application of the assessee seeking withdrawal of the appeal is allowed and the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as “withdrawn”.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as “withdrawn”.
Order pronounced in the open Court at the conclusion of hearing itself i.e. on 11th February, 2026.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026