P C PATEL INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED,BHUJ-KUTCH vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, INCOME TAX OFFICE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal was heard and granted. The Departmental Representative did not raise any objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee applied for settlement of dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2025, and sought withdrawal of the appeal. The assessee received Form No. 2 under the scheme, indicating the dispute was settled.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is permitted to withdraw the appeal based on settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, AM &
आदेश /O R D E R
PER DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JM:
Captioned appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre [(in short “NFAC/Ld. CIT(A)”] vide order dated 28.02.2023,which in turn assessment order passed by Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department / Assessing Officer under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”), vide order dated 18.12.2019.
At the outset itself, Shri Samir Bhuptani, Learned Counsel for the assessee, submitted before the Bench that assessee has applied for settlement of dispute under the scheme of the “Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2025”. That the assessee prayed for withdrawal of the appeal from this Tribunal to which, the learned Departmental Representative (DR) did not raise any objection.
That the assessee has received Form No. 2 (Vide Acknowledgement No. 802386291020125) under rule 5 of the under Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 (Dispute Settled) issued by Revenue Department. (copy of order Form No. 2 is placed on record.)
We have heard both the parties and gone through the request of the assessee for withdraw the appeal. We permit the assessee for withdraw the appeal.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 09/04/2025.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026