SHREE RAJPAR SEVA SAHKARI MANDALI LIMITED,RAJPAR vs. ITO WD 1, MORBI, MORVI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 699/RJT/2024Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 April 2025AY 2019-202 pages

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT

Before: DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, AM

For Appellant: Shri Chetan Agarwal, Ld. AR, Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
For Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Hearing: 09.04.2025

आदेश /O R D E R

PER DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JM:

1.

Captioned appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre [(in short “NFAC/Ld. CIT(A)”] vide order dated 15.07.2024, which in turn assessment order passed by Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department / Assessing Officer under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”), vide order dated 29.01.2024.

2.

At the outset itself, Shri Chetan Agarwal, Learned Counsel for the assessee, submitted before the Bench that assessee has applied for settlement of dispute under the scheme of the “Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2025”. That the assessee prayed for withdrawal of the appeal from this Tribunal to which, the learned Departmental Representative (DR) did not raise any objection.

3.

That the assessee has received Form No. 2 (Vide Acknowledgement No. 858083461030225) under rule 5 of the under Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 (Dispute Settled) issued by Revenue Department. (Copy of order Form No. 2 is placed on record.)

4.

We have heard both the parties and gone through the request of the assessee for withdraw the appeal. We permit the assessee for withdraw the appeal.

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →