Facts
The assessee filed appeals before the Tribunal with a significant delay of 703 and 429 days. The assessee attributed the delay to a lack of awareness of ex-parte orders passed by the NFAC, as the appeals filed manually with the CIT(A) in 2015/2016 had migrated to the Faceless Regime without the assessee's knowledge.
Held
The Tribunal condoned the delay, considering that the assessee had initially filed appeals promptly and was unaware of the subsequent proceedings due to the migration to the Faceless Regime. The condonation was subject to the assessee paying a cost of ₹10,000 to the State Legal Aid Authority.
Key Issues
Whether the delay in filing the appeals should be condoned due to the assessee's lack of awareness caused by the migration to the Faceless Regime.
Sections Cited
Section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA
आदेश / O R D E R PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM:
is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)/NFAC, (hereinafter referred to as “the Ld.CIT(A)”), Delhi, dated 03.10.2023 for the Assessment Year (hereinafter referred to as "AY”)
& 3663/Chny/2025 (AYs 2010-11 & 2011-12) Raghavendra Reddy Bommi Reddy assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)/Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Guwahati dated 22.07.2024 for AY 2011-12.
At the outset, it is noted that there is a delay of ‘703’ days & ‘429’ days in filing of the aforesaid appeals. The assessee has filed petition for condoning the delay supported by the affidavit. The main reason attributed for the delay was that the assessee was not aware of the impugned order of the Ld.CIT(A)/NFAC for both the assessment years. In this regard, it was brought to our notice that the assessment orders in this case for AY 2010-11 was passed on 30.11.2015 & 23.12.2015 for AY 2011-12. It was brought to our notice that in the year 2015/2016, the assessee had filed the appeals manually before the Ld.CIT(A). And the assessee was following the progress of the ibid Appeal with the office of the Ld.CIT(A), but later on the appellate proceedings got migrated to the Faceless Regime and the assessee lost touch about the appellate proceedings and out of the blue only when the demand was raised by the AO [pursuant to passing of the impugned orders], the assessee came to know about the existence of the ex-parte impugned orders passed by the NFAC dated 03.10.2023 & 22.07.2024 and the assessee immediately filed the appeals before the Tribunal which resulted in delay of ‘703’ days & ‘429’ days respectively.
& 3663/Chny/2025 (AYs 2010-11 & 2011-12) Raghavendra Reddy Bommi Reddy :: 3 ::
Having gone through the petition for condoning the delay and taking note that the assessment orders were passed in the year 2015 and the assessee is noted to have filed the appeals promptly before the First Appellate Authority which was not disposed of for a long time; and ultimately the appeals got migrated to the Faceless Regime and the assessee was in the dark and unaware of the Faceless proceedings going on against the assessee which led to the dismissal of the appeal ex parte qua assessee; and the assessee came to know about it only few days before filing of appeals before this Tribunal when the AO raised demand notice [pursuant to the dismissal of appeal by Ld CIT(A) against the assessee].
Considering the fact that the assessee wouldn’t gain any benefit by not preferring appeals against the impugned action of the Ld.CIT(A) and taking note that the assessee had filed the appeals promptly before the Ld.CIT(A), against the action of the AO, we are of the view that assessee should be given one more opportunity before the First Appellate Authority. Therefore, for the interest of justice and fair-play, we condone the delay subject to assessee remitting cost of ₹10,000/- to the State Legal Aid Authority, Hon’ble Madras High Court within three (3) months of receipt of this order; and produce necessary proof of depositing of the same before the Ld.CIT(A). And hence, we restore the appeals back to the file of the Ld.CIT(A)/NFAC for deciding the grounds of appeal raised & 3663/Chny/2025 (AYs 2010-11 & 2011-12) Raghavendra Reddy Bommi Reddy by the assessee in accordance with sub-section (6) of Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 after hearing the assessee. The assessee is directed to file all relevant documents/written submissions to substantiate the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee. The assessee to be diligent and ensure participation without fail. The Ld.CIT(A) to pass speaking order after adjudicating the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in accordance to law after hearing the assessee.
In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on the 04th day of February, 2026, in Chennai.