STATE BANK OF INDIA OFFICERS MULTI PURPOSE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY ORISSA LIMITED, CUTTACK,CUTTACK vs. ITO WARD-1(1) CUTTACK, CUTTACK
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee approached the PCCIT for condoning the delay in filing the return, and the PCCIT condoned the delay. The return was filed on 4.12.2025. In the interest of justice, the issues were restored to the Assessing Officer for readjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee, State Bank of India Officers Multi Purpose Co-operative Society, filed an appeal against the order dated 2.9.2025. The assessee had not filed its return of income for the assessment year 2019-20, and the Assessing Officer denied the benefit of exemption u/s. 80P.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is entitled to exemption u/s 80P when the return was filed belatedly and whether the delay in filing the return should be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR
आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench :
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated 2.9.2025 passed by ld CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in Appeal No.NFAC/2018-19/10379873 for the assessment year 2019-20.
Shri K.K.Bal, ld AR appeared for the assessee and Shri Vijaya Singh, ld Sr DR appeared for the revenue.
It was submitted by ld AR that the assessee had not filed its return of income for the impugned assessment year. The Assessing officer had passed the assessment order denying the assessee the benefit of exemption u/s. 80P of the Act. It was the submission that the assessee had approached the Ld. PCCIT for condoning the delay in filing of income tax return. The ld. PCCIT has condoned the delay in filing of the return as per conditions mentioned in pqara- 6 of the CBDT Circular No.13/2023 dated 26.7.2023 and has directed that the return is to be treated in response to notice u/s.139(1) of the Act vide his order dated 6.11.2025 in No.ITBA/COM/F/17/2025-26/1082342750(1). The return has been filed by the assessee on 4.12.2025. This being so, in the interest of justice, the issues in this appeal are restored to the file of the Assessing Officer to readjudicate the issue afresh after granting adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee and after taking into consideration the order of the PCCIT, Odisha vide dated 6.11.2025.
In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 4/12/2025.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Basant Kumar Gupta vs. Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S Swapnashiyana Homes Developers Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026