Facts
The assessee, an individual, did not file a return of income for AY 2010-11. Based on information regarding sale of immovable properties, the Assessing Officer (AO) re-opened the case and made additions for long-term and short-term capital gains, leading to a total income of Rs. 5,67,556/-. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal due to non-appearance despite multiple opportunities.
Held
The Tribunal noted that the assessee did not appear before the CIT(A) despite numerous opportunities. However, considering the facts and circumstances, and to meet the ends of justice, the Tribunal decided to provide one more opportunity to the assessee.
Key Issues
Whether the CIT(A) rightly dismissed the appeal for non-appearance and if the matter should be remanded back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
Sections Cited
143(3), 147, 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T VARKEY & SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA
आदेश / O R D E R
PER S. R. RAGHUNATHA, AM:
This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the order dated 31.10.2025, passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), NFAC, Delhi (in short “ld.CIT(A)”) for the assessment year (A.Y) 2010-11 against the order u/s.143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the ‘Act’) passed by the Assessing Officer (AO), Ward-1(4), Tirupur dated 29.12.2018.
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual and had not filed his return of income for A.Y 2010-11. Based on the information available from the department that the assessee had sold immovable properties to the tune of Rs.10,23,150/- during A.Y.2010-11, the case was re-opened u/s.147 of the Act and the Assessing Officer issued statutory notices to the assessee and called for details. In response, the assessee appeared and submitted a reply along with supporting documents for verification. On perusal of the documents submitted by the assessee, the AO made additions to the tune of Rs.4,81,498/- as long term capital gain and short term capital gain by arriving at a total income of Rs.5,67,556/- for the A.Y.2010-11 and concluded the assessment proceedings by passing an order u/s.143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Act dated 29.12.2018.
Aggrieved by the order of the AO, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ld.CIT(A), NFAC on 08.02.2019.
At the outset, we observed that ld.CIT(A) has provided eight opportunities for the assessee to appear for hearings as detailed in paragraph 1 of the ld.CIT(A) order to support the appeal of the assessee. However, the assessee chose to be silent and did not respond to any of the notices and hence, the ld.CIT(A), NFAC dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee by confirming the order of the AO by passing an order dated 31.10.2025. Aggrieved by the order of the ld.CIT(A), the assessee preferred an appeal before us.
The ld.AR submitted that the ld.CIT(A) has not considered the peculiar facts of the present case including the ongoing Civil Court proceedings and hence he could not appear before the ld.CIT(A). In view of the above, the ld.AR prayed that the Hon’ble Tribunal may be pleased to set aside the order of CIT(A) and remit the issues to the file of Assessing Officer. Further, ld.AR assured the bench that the ld.AR will represent on behalf of the assessee before the AO to complete the assessment proceedings effectively.
Per contra, the ld.DR submitted that both the Assessing Officer and the ld.CIT(A) provided sufficient opportunity to appear before them. However, the assessee has been negligent in responding to the statutory notices and hence, prayed for confirming the order of the ld.CIT(A).
We have heard the rival parties and perused the material available on record and gone through the orders of the lower authorities. We note that the AO has passed order by considering the submissions made by the assessee along with the information available with the department and the same has been dismissed by the ld.CIT(A), NFAC due to non-participation before the first appellate authority.
Therefore, in the present facts and circumstances of the case and to meet the ends of justice, we are deeming it fit to provide one more opportunity to the assessee and hence we set aside the order of the ld.CIT(A) and remit the matter back to the file to ld.CIT(A) to adjudicate the matter afresh in accordance with law, after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee. Needless to say, assessee to be diligent and file written submissions and relevant documents if advised so.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 11th February, 2026 at Chennai.