KARAM KORPOM FOUNDATION,CHENNAI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay and admitted the appeal for adjudication. It noted that a new clause (iv) was inserted into the first proviso of Section 80G(5) by the Finance Act, 2024, allowing applications at any time after commencement of activities. The CIT(E)'s rejection was after this amendment came into force.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an application for approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which was rejected by the CIT(E) due to a delay in filing. The appeal was filed with a delay of 39 days, for which the assessee submitted an affidavit.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the application for approval under Section 80G(5) is condonable, especially in light of a subsequent amendment to the Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Ms. S. Padmavathy
O R D E R
PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 09.06.2025 of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Chennai in rejecting the application filed in Form 10AB seeking approval under clause (iii) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short].
We find that this appeal is filed with a delay of 39 days. The assessee filed an affidavit for condonation of delay stating the reasons.
Upon hearing both the parties and on an examination of the said affidavit, in the interest of justice, we condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication.
We note that the assessee filed online application dated 06.12.2024 in Form 10AB seeking approval under clause (iii) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act. The ld. CIT(E) observed that the assessee trust ought to have applied for approval under section 80G of the Act in Form 10AB on or before September, 2024 [i.e., 6 months prior to the expiry of the period of provisional approval], but, however, the assessee trust filed application belatedly on 06.12.2024. By reproducing relevant provisions of section 80G(5)(ii) of the Act at page 5 & 6 of the impugned order, the ld. CIT(E) rejected the application filed in Form 10AB on 06.12.2024. Aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(E), the assessee is in appeal before us.
The ld. AR Ms. R. Sridevi, CA, submits that by insertion of clause (iv) into the first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act by the Finance Act, 2024 w.e.f. 01.10.2024, the assessee can apply for approval under section 80G(5) of the Act at any time after commencement of its activities and by placing reliance on the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Aalayam v. CIT(E) in dated 25.07.2025, the ld. AR prayed to remand to the matter to the file of the ld. CIT(E).
The ld. DR Shri C.N. Bipin, CIT did not object to the submissions of the ld. AR.
We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. We note that the ld. CIT(E) rejected the application filed in Form 10AB on 06.12.2024 by observing that the assessee trust ought to have applied for approval under section 80G of the Act in Form 10AB on or before September, 2024 [i.e., 6 months prior to the expiry of the period of provisional approval]. However, it is noted that clause (iv) has now been inserted into the first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act by the Finance Act, 2024, w.e.f 01.10.2024 to enable assessee trust to apply for approval u/s 80G(5) at any time after commencement of its activities. This provision is disjoint from clause (iii), which governed the earlier timeline. The ld. CIT(E) has passed the order rejecting application on 09.06.2025 after the amendment had come into force, as non maintainable. We find, on same identical facts, the Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal also taken similar view in the case of Aalayam v. CIT(E) (supra). We, therefore direct the ld. CIT(E) to treat the application filed on 06.12.2024 as having been filed under clause (iv)(B) of the first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act and decide in accordance with the law. Thus, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 19th February, 2026 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 80G(5)
- Nikunj Mahendrabhai Adani, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-1(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2026/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1491/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1484/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026