MAHESH CHAND,G B NAGAR vs. ITO, WARD-2(2), NOIDA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A)'s rejection of the adjournment application on the first hearing date was incorrect. Therefore, the matter was remanded to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision on merits after providing the assessee with a proper opportunity of hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed for non-prosecution without a decision on merits. The assessee had filed an adjournment application before the CIT(A) due to inability to prepare papers.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal for non-prosecution without deciding the merits, and if an adjournment application should have been granted.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “F + SMC”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
The aforesaid appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 30.11.2017, passed by Ld. CIT(Appeals) Noida for the quantum of assessment passed u/s 147 / 144 for the assessment year 2009-10.
The assessee is mainly aggrieved by passing of ex parte order by the Ld. CIT (A) without deciding on merits. The only issue involved in this appeal was addition on account of deposits appearing in the bank statement of Rs. 17,25,000/-. Before us, Ld. Counsel pointed out that assessee had filed an adjournment application before the Ld. CIT (A) on the ground that papers could not be prepared. However, Ld. CIT (A) has rejected the said adjournment application and dismissed the appeal for non prosecution without deciding the issue on merits.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026