STEPHAN BABU CHITRA,NAGAPATTINAM vs. ITO, WARD-1,, KUMBAKONAM

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 03.10.2025 passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’). The relevant Assessment Year is 2020-21.

At the very outset, we notice that the order of First Appellate Authority (FAA) is ex-parte, since there was no compliance from the assessee to various notices issued from the office of the First Appellate Authority. Further, we also note that the assessment has been completed on best judgment basis u/s.144 r.w.s. 144B of the Act by making addition of Rs.3,16,01,578/- u/s.69A of the Act.

During the course of hearing, the Ld.AR submitted that assessee had met with an accident during the course of assessment proceedings. Consequently, the assessee could not appear before the AO nor before the FAA. The Ld.AR further submitted that since the assessee had not produced any details with regard to cash deposits made in her bank account, the AO added the same as unexplained money u/s.69A r.w.s 115BBE of the Act, which was further confirmed by the FAA. Since the assessee had not filed any details before the lower authorities, in the interest of justice, the Ld.AR pleaded for one last opportunity to the assessee to represent her case before the AO.

The Ld.DR supported the orders of the AO and the FAA.

We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. It is an admitted fact that the assessment proceedings before the AO as well as the proceedings before the FAA were completed ex-parte, as the assessee failed to respond to the various statutory notices issued from the office of the AO & the FAA. The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee had met with an accident during the course of the assessment proceedings and, therefore, was unable to comply with the notices issued by the AO & FAA. However, no documentary evidence, such as medical records or medical certificate was produced before us to substantiate the said contention. In the absence of any supporting material, we are unable to accept the explanation so furnished. We strongly deprecate the nonchalant attitude of the assessee in not responding to the statutory notices issued by the Department. However, considering the fact that addition was made without the benefit of necessary details from the assessee, in order to meet the ends of justice and ensure fair play, we deem it appropriate to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to present her case. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, we restore the matter to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication, subject to the condition that the assessee shall pay a cost of 4 -: