HITECH ENGINEERS,MUMBAI vs. ACIT - 19(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's application to withdraw the appeal. In view of the application made by the assessee's representative, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for Assessment Year 2009-10. The assessee's representative filed an application to withdraw the present case.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee's appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn based on their application.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “H” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: S/SHRI M. BALAGANESH & AMARJIT SINGH
PER AMARJIT SINGH, JM: This is an appeal against the order dated 13/06/2017 passed by the Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-30, Mumbai [hereinafter referred to as the “CIT(A)”] relevant to the A.Y.2009-10. 2. The case was fixed for hearing today. None has appeared on behalf of the assessee. At the time of gone through the file, we noticed that assessee has moved an application to withdraw the present case dated 26/11/2018 . The assessee has authorized the CA Aarti Shah to appear before the Tribunal. The withdrawal application has been moved
by Aarti Shah which is on the file. In view of the application made by the Ld. Representative of the assessee, the present appeal is hereby ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 17.06.2019 (M. BALAGANESH) (AMARJIT SINGH) रेखा सदस्म / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER न्मायमक सदस्म/JUDICIAL MEMBER भुंफई Mumbai; ददनांक Dated : 17.06.2019 vijay आदेश की प्रनिलऱपप अग्रेपषि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अऩीराथी / The Appellant 1. प्रत्मथी / The Respondent. 2. आमकय आमुक्त(अऩीर) / The CIT(A)- 3. आमकय आमुक्त / CIT 4. ववबागीम प्रयतयनधध, आमकय अऩीरीम अधधकयण, भुंफई / DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. गार्ड पाईर / Guard file. 6. आदेशधिुसधर/ BY ORDER, सत्मावऩत प्रयत //// उप/सहधयक पंजीकधर (Dy./Asstt.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026