M/S. SIDHANT HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,NEW DELHI vs. PRINCIPAL CIT, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted that the AO had accepted the assessee's submissions after the set-aside order. Therefore, the assessee moved an application to withdraw the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Principal CIT under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) subsequently accepted the assessee's submissions in the set-aside order.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the assessee against the order under section 263 is maintainable when the AO has accepted the assessee's submissions in the subsequent proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “D” : DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. & SHRI O.P. KANT, A.M.
For Assessee : Shri Satyajeet Goyal, C.A. For Revenue : Smt. Naina Soin Kapil, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing : 10.12.2018 Date of Pronouncement : 10.12.2018 ORDER PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Pr. CIT, Delhi-8, Dated 31.03.2015, for the A.Y. 2010-2011 under section 263 of the I.T. Act, 1961.
Learned Counsel for the Assessee submitted that A.O. in the set aside Order under section 263 of the I.T. Act, has accepted the submissions of the assessee. He has,
2 ITA.No.2375/Del./2015 Sidhant Housing & Development Company, New Delhi. therefore, moved an application for withdrawal of the appeal.
In this view of the matter, appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open Court.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026