SAMEER BAHADUR,DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 59(3), ITO VIKAS BHAWAN
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer passed an order u/s 144 without granting adequate opportunity of hearing. In the interest of natural justice, the issue of exemption u/s 54 was remitted back to the Assessing Officer.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order pertaining to AY 2016-17. The assessee's grievance was that materials on record were not properly appreciated, violating principles of natural justice during reassessment proceedings.
What were the issues?
Whether principles of natural justice were violated by the AO in not granting adequate opportunity of hearing for the claim of exemption u/s 54.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “F”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA
We have heard the rival submissions and have perused the 6. material available on record. We find that the issue involved in the case for adjudication is exemption claimed u/s 54 of the Act. The AO has passed an order against the assessee u/s 144. We are of the considered view that the AO ought to have granted adequate opportunity of hearing. We, therefore, of the considered view that in the interest of natural justice, the issue of exemption u/s 54 be remitted back to the file of the AO. The AO is directed to afford three effective opportunities to the assessee and thereafter, examine the materials evidenced on record and adjudicate the issue afresh. The assessee is alsod directed to avail the opportunities and furnish requisite documents/evidence as required by the AO. Ground of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 05/02/2026.
More judgments on Section 54
- Renu Arun Talwar, Mumbai vs Circle 17(1), MumbaiITA 204/MUM/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(3)(2), Ahmedabad vs Manan Arati Patel, AhmedabadITA 923/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Rohitbhai Jivrambhai Patel, Vadodara vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(2), VadodaraITA 679/AHD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Rohitbhai Jivrambhai Patel, Vadodara vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(2), VadodaraITA 679/AHD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Dy. Commissioner of Income… vs Thomas Myladiyil Augustine, AhmedabadITA 1131/AHD/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026