PAWAN KUMAR LAUR,UTTARPRADESH vs. ITO WARD -2 (3) (2), BULANDSHAHAR

It emerges during the course of hearing that both the learned lower authorities' respective assessment and lower appellate discussion/findings dated 06.03.2024 and 27.11.2025 have held the assessee's cash deposits in the relevant previous year to the tune of Rs.32.20 lakhs as unexplained under section 69A of the Act which forms the sole substantive issue of adjudication in the instant appeal. Both the parties vehemently reiterate their respective stands against and in support of the impugned addition. Learned counsel has invited the tribunal's attention to the assessee's twin bank accounts cash flows wherein he is stated to have withdrawn Rs.38.25 lakhs in FY 2020-21 from SBI bank account and again Rs.8.85 lakhs in the relevant previous year. His case therefore is that the impugned cash deposits of Rs.32.20 lakhs represent his previous cash withdrawals only which have not been successfully proved to the entire satisfaction of both the lower authorities.

Be that as it may, this tribunal sees only a part merit in the assessee's case going by his previous withdrawals and his impugned cash deposits. It is thus deemed appropriate in the larger interest of justice that a lumpsum addition of Rs.2.20 lakhs in the hands of the assessee is deemed just and proper with a

This assessee's appeal is partly allowed.