ACIT, DELHI vs. SMT. SUDESH GAHLOT, DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessment year in question was beyond the maximum period of 10 Assessment Years from the date of satisfaction recorded under Section 153C. Relying on the jurisdictional High Court's decision in PCIT Vs. Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Ltd., the Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the CIT(A)'s order.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the order of the CIT(A) which had set aside the assessment order. The Assessee filed a Cross Objection. The issue revolves around the validity of proceedings initiated under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2011-12.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment proceedings initiated under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2011-12 are barred by limitation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- PCIT v. Ojjus Medicare (P) Ltd.277 citing465 ITR 101 · 2024 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
Before: YOGESH KUMAR U.S. & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAYSmt. Sudesh Gahlot
the Ld. CIT(A) committed error in setting aside the assessment order, thus sought for allowing the Appeal.
We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. The Ld. CIT(A) while deciding the First Appeal filed with the Assessee, relied on the ratio laid down by the Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and considering the date satisfaction recorded on 10/06/2021, held that the year under consideration i.e. A.Y 2011-12, will be beyond the maximum time period of 10 Assessment Years from the date of the satisfaction recorded u/s 153C of the Act. Therefore, in the absence of any contrary judicial precedents as the issue has been settled by the Jurisdictional high Corut in the case of Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Ltd. (supra), we find no reason to interfere with the findings and the conclusion of the Ld. CIT(A) in setting aside the assessment order. Accordingly, the Grounds of Appeal of the Revenue are dismissed as devoid of merit.
Since we have dismissed the Appeal of the Revenue, the Cross Objection filed by the Assessee becomes in-fructuous. Accordingly, Cross Objection No. 235/Del/2025 filed by the Assessee is dismissed.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026