SHRAMNER MAGASWARGIYA BAHUUDESSHIYA SANSTHA ,NAGPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION , PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 122/NAG/2025Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur16 June 2025Bench: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY (Judicial Member)1 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the assessee failed to provide necessary documents. However, considering the peculiar facts, the Tribunal remanded the issue back to the CIT(E) subject to payment of Rs. 5,500 by the assessee.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal challenging an order passed by the CIT(E). The assessee had sought registration under section 12A of the Act but failed to provide necessary documents and substantiations despite opportunities.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee is entitled to registration under section 12A of the Act when required documents were not filed?

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

Before: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY & SHRI K.M. ROY, ACCOUNTANT, MEMBER

For Appellant: Shri K.K. Thakkar
For Respondent: Shri Pankaj Kumar

Date of Hearing – 16/06/2025 Date of Order – 16/06/2025

O R D E R PER K.M. ROY, A.M.

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee challenging the impugned order dated 23/12/2024, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune, [“learned CIT(E)”].

2.

The assessee, by filing an application on 07/06/2024, had sought for registration under section 12A of the Act, however, despite affording various opportunities, as it clearly appears from the impugned order and also from Page–137 of the paper book, the assessee just replied to query and has not filed any documents nor substantiated its claim and, therefore, the assessee is 2 Shramner Magaswargiya Bahuudesshiya Sanstha Nagpur ITA no.122/Nag./2025 not entitled for any leniency. However, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case in totality, as the issue involved in the application filed by the assessee, remains to be adjudicated in its right perspective and proper manner, specifically in the absence of relevant documents and submissions which the assessee has admittedly failed to file, this Court is inclined to remand the issue back to the file of the learned CIT(E), however, subject to payment of ` 5,500 (Rupees five thousand and five hundred only) to be deposited within 15 days from the date of this order before the Revenue authorities under the “Other Head”. The assessee is also directed to file the relevant submissions/documents. It is clarified that, in case of subsequent default, the assessee shall not be entitled for any leniency.

3.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in terms as indicated above. Order pronounced in the open Court on 16/06/2025

More judgments on Section 12A

All 6,064 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →