RAJESH BHAGWANDAS PREMANI,AKOLA vs. ASSISTANT/ DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRE CIRCLE 1(3) NAGPUR, NAGPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 119/NAG/2025Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur19 June 2025AY 2018-193 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal, taking a lenient view due to the assessee's non-compliant attitude and the ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A), decided to remand the case back to the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits. This decision is subject to the assessee depositing ₹5,500/- within 15 days from the date of the order under the 'Other Head' in the Revenue Department. The assessee is also directed to file relevant submissions and documents. The Tribunal clarified that failure to comply with these conditions would disentitle the assessee to any leniency. The CIT(A) is directed to provide a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The appeal is remanded back to the CIT(A) for adjudication limited to the issue of the addition of ₹12,72,800/- under Section 68.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Rajesh Bhagwandas Premani, filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Nagpur Bench, challenging an order dated 31/01/2025 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune (CIT(A)). The assessment year in question is 2018-19. The appeal arises from an ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A). The core issue involves an addition of ₹12,72,800/- made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on account of cash credit from undisclosed sources. The assessee had not been compliant before the CIT(A) despite receiving three notices.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the ITAT should remand the case to the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits, considering the assessee's non-compliance and the ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A)? (Question of procedure and mixed law and fact) Assessee's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific contentions made by the assessee before the ITAT. However, the fact that the appeal was filed implies a challenge to the ex-parte order and a desire for adjudication on merits. Revenue's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific contentions made by the revenue before the ITAT.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 68

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

Before: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY

For Appellant: Shri Prakash Nanwani
For Respondent: Shri Anand Nagrale

The present appeal has been filed by the assessee challenging the impugned order dated 31/01/2025, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune, [“learned CIT(A)”], for the assessment year 2018–19.

2.

Considering non–compliant attitude of the assessee before the learned CIT(A) despite issuance of three notices and the fact that the issue involved pertains to the addition of ` 12,72,800/– under section 2 Rajesh Bhagwandas Premani ITA no.119/Nag./2025 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short "the Act") on account of cash credit from undisclosed sources, which remained to be adjudicated in its right perspective and proper manner, as the learned CIT(A) has passed ex–parte order, therefore, this Court, by taking a lenient view, is inclined to remand the instant case to the file of the learned CIT(A) for adjudication on merits by passing a speaking order, subject to deposit of ` 5,500/– (Rupees five thousand and five hundred only) within 15 days from the date of this order, in the Revenue Department under the “Other Head”. The assessee is also directed to file the relevant submissions/documents. It is clarified that, in case of subsequent default, the assessee shall not be entitled for any leniency. Thus, this appeal is remanded back to the file of the learned CIT(A) for adjudication, limited to the issue as mentioned above. Suffice to say, the Ld. Commissioner shall provide reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

3.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in terms, as indicated above. Order pronounced in the open Court on 19/06/2025

More judgments on Section 68

All 29,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 68 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →