M/S SAGAR HEALTHCARE & DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-5, BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT found that the CIT(Appeals) order lacked clear findings on the suo moto disallowance made by the assessee and on another disputed issue. Therefore, the matter was restored to the CIT(Appeals) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in hospital services, received dividend income and made significant investments. The Assessing Officer disallowed expenses under Section 14A and penal interest, which was upheld by the CIT(Appeals). The assessee appealed to the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Appeals) properly adjudicated the disallowance under Section 14A considering the assessee's suo moto disallowance, and whether a specific other issue was addressed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES “ C ” BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI A.K. GARODIA & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE
O R D E R
PER SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JM :
The assessee has filed an appeal against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bangalore passed under Section 143(3) and 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :
3. The Brief facts of the case are that the as is engaged in Hospital Services and filed the Return of Income on 30.09.2009 declaring total income of Rs.9,1,32,370 and the case was selected for scrutiny and Notices under Section143(2) and 142(1) of the Act were issued. In compliance, the learned Authorised Representative Assessing Officer and submitted the details. The Assessing Officer considering the financial statements of the assessee found that the assessee has received dividend income of Rs.1,84,229 and has made investments to the extent of Rs.15,14,06,308 and called for details of expenditure incurred for such dividend income. The Assessing Officer considering the investments made addition under Section 14A r.w. Rule 8D(iii) of Rs.6,59,951 and disallowed the penal interest of Rs.52,912 and assessed the total income of Rs.9,19,45,233. Aggrieved by the order of assessment, the assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(Appeals). The CIT(Appeals) considering the submissions of the assessee and findings of the Assessing Officer confirmed the addition made by the Assessing Officer under Section 14A of the Act and the disallowance of penal interest and dismissed the assessee's appeal. Aggrieved by the order of CIT(Appeals), the assessee filed an appeal before the Tribunal.
4. At the time of hearing, the learned Authorised Representative submitted on the first disputed issue of disallowance under Section 14A r.w. Rule 8D(2)(iii) in the computation of income, the learned Authorised Representative emphasized that such disallowance shall not exceed the dividend income and filed writtensubmissions in Paper Book to support the stand and for the payment of interest of Rs.52,912 in respect of delay in payment of service tax and TDS are
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026