ACIT 18(2), MUMBAI vs. KAMINI ENTERPRISES, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to discharge the onus of proving the primary conditions for Section 10AA deduction. The CIT(A)'s decision to grant relief without further inquiry was also found to be incorrect.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a deduction under Section 10AA for manufacturing activities in an SEZ. The Assessing Officer (AO) denied this deduction, finding that the assessee failed to prove any manufacturing activity due to suspicious transaction patterns and extremely short processing times.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee carried out genuine manufacturing activities in the SEZ to be eligible for deduction under Section 10AA, and whether the CIT(A) properly adjudicated the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Jansampark Advertising & Marketing (P.) Ltd.196 citing56 Taxmann.com 286 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “H” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,
उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.Registrar) आयकरअपीलीयअिधकरण, मुंबई / ITAT, Mumbai.
Sr. No. Details Date Initials Designation 1 Draft dictation sheets are attached Directly Typed Sr.PS/PS on Computer / Laptop/ 2 Draft dictated on Sr.PS/PS 3 Draft Placed before author Sr.PS/PS 4 Draft proposed & placed before the Second Member JM/AM 5 Draft discussed/approved by Second Member JM/AM 6 Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Sr.PS/PS 7 Order pronouncement on Sr.PS/PS 8 File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS/PS 9 Date on which the file goes to the Head clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the AR 11 Date of Dispatch of order
More judgments on Section 10AA
- Quantium Analytics Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 16(3), HyderabadITA 1336/HYD/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Ab Knowledge Systems, Pune vs DCIT, PuneITA 92/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- ACIT-Circle-4(1)(1), Bangalore vs Eygbs(India) Private Limited, BangaloreITA 1886/BANG/2024[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- ACIT 15(1)(2), Mumbai vs Galaxy Surfactants Limited, MumbaiITA 6984/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2011-2012
- Genpact Infrastructure (Hyderabad) Pvt… vs ITO, New DelhiITA 2055/DEL/2015[2009-10]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2009-10
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026