GRK CONSTRUCTIONS,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) was justified in passing ex-parte orders due to the assessee's repeated non-appearance. However, considering the assessee's request and in the interest of justice, the Tribunal remitted both the quantum and penalty appeals back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits, providing one final opportunity to the assessee, while cautioning the assessee to cooperate.
What were the facts?
The assessee, GRK Constructions, filed its ITR for AY 2014-15. A subsequent search operation by DG GST Intelligence revealed suppressed sales, improper books of accounts, and alleged "on-money" receipts, leading to the reopening of the assessment under Section 148. The Assessing Officer and subsequently the CIT(A) passed ex-parte orders, confirming a significant addition to income and levying a penalty, due to the assessee's non-compliance with notices.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the CIT(A) was justified in passing ex-parte orders despite the assessee's non-compliance. 2. Validity of the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148. 3. Justification of the sustained addition for alleged on-money receipts and the levied penalty under Section 271(1)(c).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(1),Section 143(3),Section 148,Section 142(1),Section 147,Section 144,Section 271(1)(c)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, HON’BLE & SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, HON’BLE
आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत /Copy of the order forwarded to:- 1. �नधा�रती/ The Assessee – GRK Constructions, D.No. 1-83-23/1, Plot No.34, Renuka Nivas, Sector-5, MVP Colony, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh – 530017. 2. राज�व/The Revenue – The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- 3(1), O/o. ITO, Infinity Towers, Sankaramatam Road, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh – 530016. 3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, 4.आयकर आयु�त (अपील)/ The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), 8 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, �वशाखापटणम/ DR, ITAT, Visakhapatnam 6.गाड� फ़ाईल / Guard file आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER
Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Visakhapatnam
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026