DY. COMMISSIIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. KAVYA AVENUES LLP, VISAKHAPATNAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the addition of on-money receipts was not justified as the cash payments did not belong to the assessee firm. However, the Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A) in allowing telescopic benefit for the unaccounted expenditure.
What were the facts?
During a search operation, unaccounted cash receipts of Rs. 4,31,77,430/- were found related to the sale of flats. The Assessing Officer added this amount as unexplained money and also added Rs. 39,03,970/- as unexplained expenditure.
What were the issues?
Whether the on-money receipts found during the search belong to the assessee and whether unexplained expenditure should be allowed as a telescopic benefit against the un-admitted receipts.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 132,Section 143(3),Section 142(1),Section 69A,Section 115BBE,Section 69C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Sumati Dayal v. CIT1,967 citing214 ITR 801 · 1995 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Durga Prasad More1,579 citing82 ITR 540 · 1971 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM “DIVISION” BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, HON’BLE & SHRI S BALAKRISHNAN, HON’BLE
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आदेश की प्रतततिति अग्रेतषत/ Copy of the order forwarded to:- 1. तिर्ााररती/ The Assessee : M/s. Kavya Avenues LLP 7-5-64, Ground Floor Pandurangapuram Visakhapatnam – 530003 Andhra Pradesh 2. राजस्व/ The Revenue : DCIT – Central Circle – 1 5th Floor, Direct Taxes Building MVP Colony, Visakhapatnam – 530017 Andhra Pradesh 3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 4. तिभागीय प्रतततितर्, आयकरअिीिीयअतर्करण, तिशाखािटणम /DR,ITAT, Visakhapatnam 5. The Commissioner of Income Tax 6. गार्ाफ़ाईि / Guard file आदेशािुसार / BY ORDER
Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Visakhapatnam
Page No. 12
More judgments on Section 132
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026