DCIT, KARNAL vs. M/S PICCADILY AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD., KARNAL
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Revenue, based on the CBDT's circular, requested to withdraw the appeal. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2012-13. The CBDT issued a circular directing withdrawal of appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal should be withdrawn based on CBDT circulars.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’,
Before: SHRI N. K. BILLAIYA, & SHRI K. N. CHARY
PER N. K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
With this appeal, the Revenue has challenged the correctness of the order of the ld. CIT(A), Karnal dated 18.11.2016 pertaining to A.Y 2012-13.
Vide letter dated 05.04.2019, Additional CIT, Karnal Range, Karnal has directed the ld. DR to withdraw the appeal consequent to the Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the CBDT.
The ld. DR submitted the said letter.
On the basis of the said letter, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the revenue in is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 11.04.2019.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026