POOTHAKULAM SERVICE CO OPEARATIVE BANK LTD NO 2944,KOLLAM vs. ITO WARD - 2, KOLLAM

PDF · subscribers
ITA 325/COCH/2024Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 January 2025AY 2020-21Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV (Judicial Member)3 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

Following the Jurisdictional High Court's decision in PCIT v. Peroorkada Service Co-op. Bank Ltd., the Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to a deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act for interest income received from District Co-operative Bank and Treasury.

What were the facts?

Poothakulam Service Co-op. Bank Ltd., a co-operative society, filed a Nil return for AY 2020-21. The Assessing Officer added Rs. 3,69,27,761/- to its income under Section 56, considering interest earned from banks as 'income from other sources'. The CIT(A) confirmed this addition.

What were the issues?

Whether interest income earned by a co-operative society from banks and treasury is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 144B,Section 56,Section 80P,Section 80P(2)(d),Section 80P(2)(a)(i)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV, JM

For Appellant: Shri Rajagopal, CA
For Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Hearing: 19.12.2024Pronounced: 21.01.2025

O R D E R Per: Inturi Rama Rao, AM This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 29.12.2023 for Assessment Year (AY) 2020-21.

2.

Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is a co-operative society engaged in providing credit facilities to its members and also carrying banking business to its members. The appellant filed the return of income for AY 2020-21 on 04.02.2021 declaring Nil Poothakulam Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. income. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the by the Income Tax Officer, Ward -2, Kollam (hereafter “the AO”) vide order dated 19.09.2022 passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) at a total income of Rs. 3,69,27,761/- by making an addition of Rs. 3,69,27,761/- u/s. 56 of the Act on account of interest earned from banks as “income from other sources”.

3.

Being aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A), who vide the impugned order confirmed the action of the AO.

4.

Being aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before us in the present appeal

We have heard the rival contentions of both the parties and 5. perused the material available on record. We notice that the issue related to interest income received from banks stands adjudicated by Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court’s decision in the case of PCIT v. Peroorkada Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. [2022] 442 ITR 141 (Ker) wherein their Lordships have rejected the Revenue’s identical stand as under: - “12.2 Section 80P deals with Co-operative Societies' computation of income. As already noted, it has four sections and several sub-sections and clauses. The Parliament has considered the various situations in which the exigible income and the deductable income of the assessee is considered while computing the income of the assessee. For getting deduction, in our considered view, the assessee must also establish that the interest income earned by the assessee is from a Co-operative Society. As a matter of fact, in the case on hand, there is no dispute that it is not from a Co-operative Society registered under Kerala Co-operative Societies Act. The interest income earned from District Co-operative Bank/State Co-operative Bank, in the facts and circumstances of the case, do come within Section 80P(2)(d). Therefore, the income constitutes income from other sources and the only eligible Poothakulam Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. deduction is covered by Section 80P(2)(d) viz. Interest or dividend derived by the assessee from its investments with any other Co-operative Society. The source of interest income is from Bank and Treasury, interest income received from Treasury be included in the computation of total income of the assessee. In other words, interest earned from Treasury is inadmissible for deduction and interest income from Co-operative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act are eligible for deduction. The contra consideration of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal is incorrect and liable to be modified as stated above. Hence, it is held that the interest income earned by the assessee does not come within the ambit of Section 80P(2)(a)(i) and permissible deduction of interest income is limited to Co-operative Societies/Banks registered under Kerala Co-operative Societies Act under clause (d) of the Act and effect order on the above lines is made by the Assessing Officer. The questions are accordingly answered.”

6.

Respectfully following the above decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court, we hold that the assessee is entitled for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act on account of interest received from District Co-operative Bank and Treasury.

More judgments on Section 144B

All 10,521 judgments and leading authorities on Section 144B →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →