Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH : G : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA & MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE
BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2010-11 Suman Lakhani, Vs. ACIT, Plot No.265, Sector-24, Circle-II, Faridabad. Faridabad. PAN: AAGPL7939R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 07.05.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 22.05.2019 ORDER
PER R.K. PANDA, AM:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 12.11.2014 of the CIT(A)-2, Faridabad, relating to Assessment Year 2010-11.
This appeal was fixed for a number of times and it was last fixed for hearing on 13th March, 2019. Since none appeared on behalf of the assessee, therefore, notice through RPAD was issued fixing the hearing of appeal for 07.05.2019. However, when the name of the assessee was called, none appeared on behalf of the assessee nor any petition seeking adjournment of the case was filed. This type of conduct on the part of the assessee shows that she is not interested in prosecuting the appeal field by her. Therefore, following the decisions mentioned below, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed for want of prosecution:-
1. 1. CIT vs. B.N. Bhattachargee & Anr., 118 ITR 461. 2. Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (M.P.). 3. Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Multiplan India (P.) Ltd, 38 ITD 320 (Del.).