KOZHIKODE CITY POLICE EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE SOCIETY,KOZHIKODE vs. THE PCIT , KOZHIKODE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The learned CIT-DR stated that he had no objection to the withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee. In view of the assessee's submission and the lack of objection from the revenue, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) dated 21.02.2023, under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2018-2019. During the hearing, the assessee's representative submitted a request to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal against a Section 263 order could be withdrawn based on their request and the respondent's non-objection.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail
:Asst.Year 2018-2019 Kozhikode City Police The Income Tax Officer Employees Co-operative Society v. Ward – 1 1, Pavamani Road Kozhikode. Kozhikode – 673 001. PAN : AACAK5965F. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Smt.Parvathy Ammal, CA Respondent by : Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR Date of Date of Hearing : 24.03.2025 Pronouncement : 14.05.2025 O R D E R
Per Inturi Rama Rao, AM :
This appeal filed by the appellant is directed against the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) dated 21.02.2023 passed u/s.263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2018-2019.
At the time of hearing before us, the learned AR of the assessee submitted that the assessee wishes to withdraw its appeal.
The learned CIT-DR has no objection for withdrawing the appeal by the assessee.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced on this 14th day of May, 2025.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026