KALAVOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. ITO,WARD-5, ALAPPUZHA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal, affirming that no deduction under Section 80P is available to an assessee who fails to file the return of income in time. The Tribunal based its decision on the jurisdictional High Court's judgment in *Nileshwar Range Kallu Chethu Vyavasaya Thozhilali Sahakarana Sangham v. CIT*.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative society, deposited a large amount of cash during the demonetization period but failed to file its Income Tax Return despite receiving notices. The Assessing Officer consequently made substantial additions to its income, and the CIT(A) denied the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 80P, citing the non-filing of the return within the prescribed time.
What were the issues?
Whether a co-operative society is entitled to a deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961, if it fails to file its return of income within the stipulated time.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 142(1),Section 80P,Section 80P(2),Section 80P(2)(a)(i),Section 80A(5)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Nileshwar Range Kallu Chethu Vyavasaya Thozhilali Sahakarana Sangham v. CIT76 citing459 ITR 730 · 2023 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN
Before: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav
Asst.Year 2017-2018 Kalavoor Service Co-operative The Income Tax Officer Bank Limited, Kalavoor PO v. Ward 5 Alappuzha – 688 522. Alappuzha. PAN : AADAK5688A. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : --- None --- Respondent by : Sri.Sundarasan S, CIT-DR Date of Pronouncement : 26.05.2025 Date of Hearing : 22.05.2025. O R D E R
Per Prakash Chand Yadav, JM :
The present appeal of the assessee is arising from the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre / learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [“CIT(A)” for short] dated 26.07.2024, having DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- 25/1067071732(1) and relates to the assessment year 2017- 2018.
Brief facts of the case as coming out from the orders of the authorities below are that the assessee is a co-operative society registered as a primary agricultural credit society under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, deposited huge amount of cash in its bank account during demonetization period. Observing this, the department took the case of the assessee under scrutiny. During the course of assessment . Kalavoor SC.B Limited. proceedings, it is observed by the Assessing Officer that the assessee has not filed any return of income for the impugned assessment year. Accordingly notice u/s.142(1) of the Income- tax Act, 1961 was issued to the assessee asking for the return of income. However, this notice remained un-complied with. Thereafter so many notices were issued to the assessee, but the assessee could not file return of income, rather, replied simply that since the assessee is a co-operative society and eligible for deduction u/s.80P of the Act and not having taxable income, it has not filed the return of income for the impugned assessment year. The AO could not find any force in the argument of the assessee and hence framed the assessment by making addition of Rs.2,79,87,000/- The AO also made other addition of Rs.43,19,484, which represents other deposits received by the assessee-society during the year under consideration.
Aggrieved with the order of the AO, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A) and argued that the assessee is entitled for deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act on the sums received by the assessee-society from the members. However, the CIT(A) considering the provisions of section 80A(5) of the Act, held that since the assessee has not filed the return of income on time, the assessee is not entitled for deduction u/s.80P(2).
Aggrieved with the order of the CIT(A), the assessee has come up in appeal before us. None appeared on behalf of the assessee, in-spite of the proper service of notice. However, the . Kalavoor SC.B Limited. issue is squarely covered by the judgment of the Hon’ble jurisdictional in the case of Nileshwar Range Kallu Chethu Vyavasaya Thozhilali Sahakarana Sangham v. CIT (2023) 459 ITR 730 (Ker.). Therefore, we are deciding this appeal on the basis of the material available on record.
The learned CIT-DR relied upon the orders of the authorities below.
After hearing the arguments of the learned CIT-DR and perusing the material available on record, we are of the firm opinion that the issue involved in this appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of Nileshwar Range Kallu Chethu Vyavasaya Thozhilali Sahakarana Sangham (supra), wherein it has been that no deduction u/s 80(P) is available to such assessee who did not file return of income in time. Therefore, respectfully following the judgment of the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court cited supra, we hereby dismiss this appeal of the assessee.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced on this 26th day of May, 2025.
More judgments on Section 142(1)
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Subhash Chand Saini, Jaipur vs ITO Ward, Behror, BherorITA 36/JPR/2023[2017-18]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gaurav Jiteshbhai Joshi, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1000/RJT/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026